George Tiller was murdered this morning outside his church in Wichita, Kansas. America's Christian terrorists strike again.
« April 2009 | Main | June 2009 »
George Tiller was murdered this morning outside his church in Wichita, Kansas. America's Christian terrorists strike again.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 02:03 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
Posted by litbrit at 04:22 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
The most disturbing news I've read this week is this story about the Ukrainian economy, which has apparently contracted by 23% ... in three months time. At best:
Those are not bad numbers - they are cataclysmic. A country as large as Ukraine heading for failed state status should be a global concern. Putin must be smiling quietly.
Posted by nimh at 09:00 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
Last May, Time published an article about North Korea's food situation. Contra the lede, closer to 2 million people died during the famine of the 1990s, almost ten percent of the total population. Their food production ability hasn't improved much since then. I can report anecdotally that every winter, small villages are on their own, getting no help from the central government. A lot of people die from starvation.
And as the above-referenced article says, it was just a year ago that several organizations were predicting another round of mass starvation deaths. Every aspect of that nation is in shambles. There is very little electricity, even running water. Enormous stands of trees have been stripped of bark used as human food. The entire nation faces chronic shortages of medical supplies.
North Korea is in every way possible a failed state. They can't feed themselves, can't support industry, can't provide medical care. The central government is concerned only with maintaining itself and its military, and has failed so completely that it can't even accomplish that. North Korea is run by an erratic, power-mad dictatorship that finds itself dependent upon the nations it demonizes in order to survive.
That's the proper context for viewing North Korea's recent nuclear and missile tests. I've said this before, but it bears repeating because people insist upon considering them to be an existential threat, when they are nothing of the sort. They're not going to attack China or Russia because those countries are almost as crazy as they are. They're not going to attack South Korea with unconventional weapons because they'd just destroy themselves, and they're not capable of waging a conventional war with South Korea. Every male over the age of 21 has either served in the South Korean military or is currently doing so. They're better equipped, better trained and healthier - and there's around 30,000 US soldiers in South Korea as well, with the promise of swift, brutal retaliation if anything happened to them.
We need to worry about North Korea selling its nuclear technology, but that's the same worry we have about all sorts of nations, and the former Soviet Bloc has a lot more nukes distributed among nations that are, at best, only marginally more stable than North Korea. Nort Korea is part of a problem, not the problem itself.
North Korea is simply hungry and in need of grist for its domestic propaganda mills. It's highly dysfunctional, but give them what they want and they'll calm down. Short of invasion, it's the best we can do.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 10:28 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)
At the gym this morning I could not help but notice that corpulent right wing fuck Karl Rove (that's actually his official title) on Fox "News" going on about the possibility of a filibuster against Sonia Sotomayor.
To which I say, paraphrasing the words of Mr. Rove's former boss, bring it the fuck on.
Please GOP, filibuster a woman of Puerto Rican descent, who grew up in the projects in the Bronx, yet managed to attend Princeton and Yale Law School. Sotomayor worked as a federal prosecutor and corporate attorney before getting appointed to the federal bench by Bush 41, and then served on the Court of Appeals for ten years after Clinton elevated her to the Second Circuit. She is clearly well qualified and her appontment would be a milestone. But hey, filibuster away.
This is just what the Republican base wants and I would hate to see them deprived of the opportunity of denying this woman a seat on the high court.
Let this happen and then Obama should make a priority of passing comprehensive immigration reform. The Republicans can then spend the next twenty years seeing if they can crack the 40% mark in presidential elections.
Posted by Sir Charles at 10:24 AM | Permalink | Comments (22)
President Obama followed all the normal traditions for Memorial Day, visiting the Tomb of the Unknowns and sending a wreath to the Confederate Memorial in Arlington. He "also took the unprecedented step of sending a wreath to the African American Civil War Memorial in Washington's historically black U Street neighborhood."
That's depressingly typical. Honoring traitors at a memorial designed to revise the history of their crimes is customary, while honoring the hundreds of thousands of blacks who fought to preserve the union and free their brothers and sisters still in bondage is "unprecedented." Nor should it surprise anyone that these soldiers of the United States of America are not buried in Arlington, while enemy soldiers of the Confederate States of America are.
Not that it will help those closed to reason, but the battle of Shiloh was fought, in part, on my ancestors' plantation. They owned slaves. They were some of the first to join the KKK. And they were wrong - wrong to own slaves, wrong to betray their nation and wrong to join a terrorist organization after they lost the war. It's should be unnecessary to make up comforting lies about who our ancestors really were and what they actually did in order to feel good about ourselves.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 06:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
Fareed Zakaria, this week:
Following a civilian nuclear strategy has big benefits. The country would remain within international law, simply asserting its rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, a position that has much support across the world. That would make comprehensive sanctions against Iran impossible. And if Tehran's aim is to expand its regional influence, it doesn't need a bomb to do so. Simply having a clear "breakout" capacity—the ability to weaponize within a few months—would allow it to operate with much greater latitude and impunity in the Middle East and Central Asia.Gwynne Dyer, 2007:
Many countries have similar enrichment facilities to upgrade uranium as fuel for nuclear reactors, and that is what Iran now says it is doing, too. If the Iranian government also knows that, in a crisis, it could run the fuel through the centrifuges more times and turn it into weapons-grade uranium, well, so do lots of other governments. It is called a "threshold" nuclear weapons capability, and it is a very popular option.And he said the same thing in 2006, too.
Posted by DymaxionWorldJohn at 03:38 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted by litbrit at 11:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
From the "learn something new everyday files," it seems that the US President sends a wreath to the Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetary every Memorial Day. This year, a group of historians has sent a letter to President Obama, asking him to discontinue this practice.
Fat chance. Let's face it, whatever else Obama may or may not accomplish, he will never miss a chance to perform a set piece of bipartisan pageantry, especially one of this magnitude. He's not going to end warrantless wiretapping or bring the prisoners in Guantanamo before real courts. He might let DADT sit around to his next term and then see if he wants to repeal it. He may be able to get healthcare reform through or not. But President Obama is going to prove every goddamn day that he is more bipartisan than anyone this country has ever seen.
A little over 140 years ago the residents of the American south rose up and began brutally slaughtering thousands of their fellow citizens to defend a despicable system of slavery. They chose to kill and destroy instead of recognizing that the tide of history had finally turned against them. Yet the memory of these traitors and murderers is honored, the reasons for their crimes santized. Deserters from the US military - men who took and then broke an oath of service to the Constitution of the United State - are given memorials and characterized as men of honor. No wonder so much of our country has no understanding of right from wrong. No wonder there is so little concern with prosecuting the crimes committed by the Bush Administration - we still can't stomach an honest accounting of the Civil War! We'd rather let millions of Americans believe comforting lies that continue to damage this nation than force them to simply grow up and face facts.
Let's just declare Bush and Cheney's birthdays federal holidays now and be done with it. Maybe we can build a giant statue of one or the other of them and require everyone to bow before it or risk being thrown into a fiery furnace.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 03:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (23)
Judy Berman has a post on Broadsheet summarizing the fight to keep "gender identity disorder" from being listed in the newest version of the DSM. The title of her article makes clear what opponents of GIS' listing in the DSM are upset about. The article is called "Are transgender people mentally ill?" gidreform.com's title bar reads "because our identities are not disordered," which I can certainly support in spirit, but not recoginizing gender dysmorphia as a pathology has already had nasty consequences for people needing sexual reassignment surgery in Manitoba, in that the surgery is categorized as being "cosmetic" and therefore ineligble for government subsidy.
If gender dysmorphia is a non-problem, it doesn't need to be treated with expensive surgery. Categorizing transexuals as suffering a pathology should be morally meaningless. If a transexual individual needs surgery to correct a mismatch between their gender and their sex, they have a problem with their original body that can be treated with surgery/medication/counseling - as far as I can tell, what advocates for sexual diversity are objecting to with GIS' listing is the ablist stigma that comes with mental illness. In the real world where transsexuals are subjected to violence and discrimination, it's probably asking a little too much to strike a blow against ablism and homophobia all in one fell swoop. SRS is not a one-size-fits-all solution to gender dysmorphia; plenty of transsexual individuals don't want to physically modify their bodies, so surgery is not indicated in every case. This detail would be crucial to GIS' listing in the DSM.
When straight-and-narrow types want to tell transsexuals that they are disordered and should go to hell/the doctor for it, it takes some guts and nuance to say that re-education doesn't "work," but in many situations, gender reassignment does treat the suffering/pathology. This is where the comparison to delisting homosexuality in the 70s departs from the situation with gender identity disorder and the DSM. Homosexuality doesn't need to be/can't be treated with anything whatsoever. Transsexuals who pursue sexual reassignment surgery are meeting physical needs that cissexuals don't have.
Posted by Sara E Anderson at 11:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
I now give you last week's blogging, today! Two warnings: First, some hard core nerd coming up. Second, beyond this point there be spoilers.
Posted by DymaxionWorldJohn at 10:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Maine, as you know, recently legalized same sex marriage, which means that opponents of equal rights are mobilizing to overturn the law with a ballot initiative. Maine's secretary of state has finalized the wording of the ballot measure thusly:
Both sides, according to the linked article, are happy with this language. After the fiasco in California, where people apparently were confused into voting for Proposition 8 even though they support same sex marriage - at least that's what I heard - I wonder what effect this language will have.
Will people focus on "lets same-sex couples marry" or on "allows individuals and religious groups to refuse to perform these marriages?" For people who are uncomfortable with same sex marriage, focusing on the former will lead them to support the ballot measure. But focusing on the latter could perhaps lead them to oppose the ballot measure. What say you?
Posted by Stephen Suh at 12:29 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)
Michael Steele has apparently accomplished something other than making Democrats ecstatic about his position as RNC chair: the RNC will not tell the Democrats to rename themselves the "Democrat Socialist Party."
Well, good. I've always preferred Demoncrat - ooh, how about DemonKKKrat? "DemonKKKrat Socialist Fascist Poopyhead Party." That'd show us.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 11:51 AM | Permalink | Comments (3)
One of the Starbucks locations at which I worked was in a pretty wealthy area, yet our tips were just a little over half the area average. One of the younger baristas wondered about that, asking, "wouldn't our tips be higher than most of the other stores since people around here are so rich?"
I simply replied, "Do you really think these people got rich by giving their money away?"
You know, Jesus had something to say about this very thing. Funny how people haven't changed, and how we haven't yet learned lessons from thousands of years ago. A fair chunk of Jesus's parables and other teaching can be summed up as, "rich people are assholes." Fail to understand this and you'll get burned every time.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 11:18 PM | Permalink | Comments (15)
John Aravosis has managed to write a post that is factually accurate, yet completely ill-informed and just plain wrong in its conclusions.
His point is that John Huntsman, newly appointed ambassador to China, is going to proselytize for his Mormon faith during his tenure. He cites a post, now removed but still in Google's cache, from a Utah state representative declaring,
John goes on to declare,
This is wrong on so many levels. The first is that if the LDS church really doesn't have a missionary presence in China, they just aren't trying very hard. I've got several friends who do missionary work* in China. Some of them work completely out in the open; others have to be a little more discreet. One friend in particular works with the state-sanctioned Three Self Church right in Beijing. I've also got friends who are missionaries in North Korea. You can do this type of work anywhere.
Secondly, it's like John doesn't understand what being the US Ambassador to China means. Amb. Huntsman is going to be a public figure. He will be watched everywhere he goes. Nothing he says or does will be private. That's why the world's various intelligence agencies don't try to get their spies installed as ambassadors.
Finally, it's guaranteed that Huntsman will not be held to the LDS church's obligations for missionary work. John is correct that the Mormons don't have a "live and let live" faith. But he forgets that they're also very cognizant of good and bad PR, which is why they've tried to downplay their involvement in California's Proposition 8 campaign. They're not going to ask Huntsman to embarrass himself, and therefore the entire Mormon organization, by trying to convert Hu Jintao to Mormonism.
Frankly, though John treats the appointment as a disaster-in-waiting, we should be so lucky that his predictions come true. Imagine what it would do for the GOP's deteriorating image if their most moderate politician turned out to be just another clueless religious zealot.
*Rest assured that this missionary work has more to do with what is generally known as "compassionate ministry" than just standing on street corners and telling everyone how sinful they are, or they wouldn't still be my friends.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 06:08 PM | Permalink | Comments (12)
In New Jersey's Republican primary for next this year's Governor race, Chris Christie is facing Steve Lonegan. Christie is the moderate posing as a strident conservative, and Lonegan is the real deal.
Lonegan is catching a lot of attention for advocating a flat tax. But where the right's zealotry is really showing its true, blockhead face is on ... preschool.
You see, the state Supreme Court recently mandated the government to extend state-funded preschool "from 31 urban districts to 84 additional school districts in the suburbs," as conservative columnist Paul Mulshine explains. And Christie seemed to agree:
This, a foreigner like me may not realise, is bad. Very bad. And so Christie had to backtrack during last week's primary debate:
Mulshine, mind, agrees that preschool is a bad thing: "It is indeed wrong, but again that thought seems to have come to Christie only when he realized how unpopular preschool is with the Republican base."
"How unpopular preschool is with the Republicans." I'd never realised that preschool was on the list of things conservatives hate as well. I shouldn't be surprised, and yet somehow I am anyway.
How can one be against preschool? It has proven to be immensely beneficial for children's educational achievements. Attending preschool makes children more likely to succeed in school later on. Educational achievement makes it easier for youngsters to succeed in the outside world, fend for themselves, get themselves a proper job, make their own way.
This is especially true for children from disadvantaged families. For children who do not grow up in families where knowledge is there to be absorbed and parents are both eager and able to impart it, preschool can make all the difference. It can allow kids to not start primary school with a lag in development that hampers their chances in education from the start.
Responsible conservatives should love this. Promote education, so kids who might otherwise grow up [for galg en rad] instead gain the skills at a young age to succeed in the world on their own. Isn't that the kind of thing a sternly conservative pater familias would intone? Education, education, education, that's what these people need! Don't give them more benefits, make sure they send their children to school! So those at least grow up to be proper, responsible citizens!
A traditional conservative, for that matter, would also insist on respectful deference to the Supreme Court, rather than engage in rousing people against it. Me, I've never been good at deference. But then that alone kept me from becoming a conservative. So it's odd, even after all this time, to see conservatives rail against authority - to the point of turning against the state's highest justices.
Posted by nimh at 01:47 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (18)
Mark Silk - who has managed to insinuate himself into my list of essential blogs, no mean feat - has an interesting post on the latest Gallup poll on the abortion issue. Much has been made of how the poll shows a majority of respondents self-identifying as "pro-life." Mark, however, notes that when one gets away from the labeling portion of the survey, support for keeping abortion legal is pretty much in line with what it has been for some time now. What's really interesting is, "if Gallup is to be believed, "pro-life" is now a term that 20 percent or so of pro-choicers now use to describe themsleves."
The question before us is whether this is a positive development for choice or not. It's possible that having people with pro-choice attitudes beginning to identify themselves as "pro-life" indicates a willingness to be influenced away from their support of abortion's current legal status. Or, it's possible that the anti-choice movement has become so extreme - opposing contraception, excommunicating doctors that save a 9-year-old girl's life - that they're losing the rhetoric war, allowing people to inform terms like "pro-life" with meanings that Randall Terry never intended.
Clearly the best course of action for those of us who support the basic human right of women's reproductive autonomy is to hope for the latter while acting according to the former.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 01:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Now that the Philadelphia Inquirer has given monthly column space to a sloppy, incompetent torture apologist to defend against charges of being a bunch of knee-jerk liberals, it surely isn't too soon to declare that it has been and will be an unqualified success. We can assume that the Inqy's balance sheet is awash in a sea of black ink now that they're not jerky-kneed hippies.
After Ross Douthat fails to save the New York Times from the abyss, maybe they'll give Don Black a call. Wouldn't want their editorial board to all have knee surgery.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 10:31 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
One could be forgiven--if one relied on mainstream media for all one's information--for thinking that the swine flu (AH1N1 virus) has lost its momentum and somehow grown weaker and less threatening since the initial and frightening coverage we saw a few weeks ago. But one would be horribly wrong in so assuming. Indeed, the virus remains deadly and has brought about (ongoing) school-closings in New York, as well as other affected states (all emphasis mine):
The assistant principal of a Queens school who had been hospitalized with swine flu died on Sunday evening. It was the first death in New York State from the outbreak and came as city officials announced that five more Queens schools had been closed.
The assistant principal, Mitchell Wiener, 55, had been “overwhelmed” by the illness despite treatment with an experimental drug, according to Ole Pedersen, a spokesman for Flushing Hospital Medical Center, where Mr. Wiener had been a patient since last Wednesday.
The World Health Organization is poised to raise the Pandemic Alert Level to 6--its highest--and Japan, with 93 confirmed cases, is rapidly closing schools and screening citizens:
In Japan, authorities ordered more than 1,000 schools and kindergartens in and near the cities of Kobe and Osaka to shut down. There were no confirmed cases in Tokyo.
Until Friday, Japan thought it had contained the virus after finding four infected people who had visited North America and flown home. It quarantined them and 50 other passengers, began sending medical workers to meet each flight arriving from North America to take temperatures of those on board and told visitors they would need to have their temperatures recorded daily.
But on Saturday, the authorities confirmed that a 17-year-old student in Kobe who had not been overseas was infected; as of Sunday evening, the number of recorded cases rose to 93 throughout Japan.
Kobe residents rushed to hospitals, where doctors in biohazard suits checked people for fever in tents set up in parking lots, Agence France-Presse reported. Transit workers and supermarket employees began wearing masks.
And Stateside, the widower of the first American casualty, 33-year-old special education teacher Judy Dominguez Trunnell, has taken the first steps toward filing a wrongful death lawsuit against Smithfield Foods:
Trunnell's petition seeks to investigate claims that the H1N1 outbreak began in Smithfield's massive pork operation in La Gloria and that the virus may have been caused in part by the conditions under which the farm operates, which the petition terms "horrifically unsanitary."
"This affected my family," says Trunnell, a paramedic who will now be raising two children on his own. "I need someone to be held accountable for this."
If Trunnell ends up following through with a wrongful-death suit against Smithfield Foods, it will most likely make legal history. No one has ever tried to hold a corporation responsible for the inadvertent creation of an infectious disease. Trunnell and his lawyer, Marc Rosenthal, do not claim that Smithfield purposely bred the virus, but rather that its Perote operation, which raises some 1 million pigs annually in close quarters, established the necessary conditions for the virus to arise. If Smithfield had taken better care of its farm, the petition claims, H1N1 might never have been introduced to the world.
"We think that the conditions down there are a recipe for disaster," says Rosenthal. "This type of virus is more likely to evolve and mutate in this much filth and putrescence. It's more than a mere coincidence that the first cases emerged right there in La Gloria."
Tonight, the families of Judy Dominguez Trunnell and Mitchell Wiener, who coincidentally had both devoted their lives to educating children, are in my thoughts--as of course are the many families worldwide who've been affected by this virus.
Posted by litbrit at 09:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)
...if we'll get to enjoy the talents of musicians like this little guy. Watch 9-year-old guitar whiz Yuto Miyazawa play Ozzy Osbourne's Crazy Train on the May 11th episode of Ellen. And be sure to stick around for the finale, ahem.
(H/T Sons Two and Three)
Posted by litbrit at 03:37 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Bruce Dern, playing a beleaguered fortysomething guy in the very funny movie Middle Age Crazy (1980), addresses the graduating class and tells it like it is.
(The previous post sparked my memory and sent me searching for this clip; lo and behold, there it was--thank you, O Beauteous Internets.)
Posted by litbrit at 02:00 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Since Sir Charles kick-started the whole bitterness theme last night, I thought I'd keep the bile going by sharing this wonderful rant, by Drew Magary of Deadspin, with all of you, our lovely readers.
(Has it really been, uh, twenty-eight years since I stayed up all night party-hopping across Gainesville, crawled home to my apartment at dawn, downed a quart of sludge-thick coffee, plunked the same silly tasseled hat on my head--just as they're doing this month at campuses around the nation--and wrapped my already-overheated body in the same heavy robe?
Yes...yes, I suppose it has.
And from what I'm seeing in the news, grads today will have just as much futile fun trying to parlay said degrees into paying careers: thanks to the flaccid economic conditions that characterized the early 1980's, we fresh-faced, newly-degreed journalismers considered ourselves lucky to land the odd bar-tending or cocktailing job, supplementing as we could with hilariously cheesy modeling stints for used car lots or cafeteria chains while waiting to hear back from one of the fourteen airlines to which we'd sent in applications for a flight attendant position. Good times!)
But Drew says it all so much better:
That's the reason there are celebrity graduation speakers: to boost the already healthy egos of the graduating class. It's strictly for name-dropping value. Oooh, you guys are so special, Fed Chairman Ben Barnanke wanted to give you a pep talk! This is bullshit. College grads don't deserve to be feted by celebrities, or honored, or lifted up with inspiring words. They deserve to be BROUGHT THE FUCK DOWN BY THE CRUSHING WEIGHT OF REAL LIFE'S BITTER DISAPPOINTMENTS. They deserve a stern lecture from someone like me, who is NOT famous, NOT inspiring, and NOT attractive to look at.
I bet you grads had one hell of a spring, didn't you? Oh, I bet you spent your whole spring taking a miniscule courseload, lounging on blankets outside on the quad, fucking each other, drinking your gay little Twisted Teas... I bet you even smoked pot on Wednesday morning, just for the hell of it. I bet you just had the time of your fucking lives the past four years, didn't you?
YOU MAKE ME SICK.
Guess what, fuckos? Party's over. You're out of college now, and your parents are now too poor to nurse you through grad school. No more fantasy life for you. No more ice luges. No more intellectual discourse. [...]
At some point, you will not be able to sleep in past 8 or 9AM, and this will piss you off. I used to be cool. I used to be able to sleep until noon no problem. I SPAT RIGHT IN MORNING'S FUCKING EYE. No waking up at dawn for me. Waking up early is crazy gay. Am I right?Except then I got a job, so I had to wake up early every day. Then, my body got used to waking up early every day, so it just woke the fuck right up at the same time on weekends, too. "But Body," I said to my big fat body, "There's nothing to fucking do, and I wanna sleep more." But my body wouldn't have it. Then I got married. Then I had kids. And holy shit, do kids wake up early. Not only does my kid come storming into the room at 6AM, but she screams WAKE UP at the top of her lungs every damn time. Having a kid is just like having a really mean spinning instructor. They give no fucking quarter. They're like tiny little Hitlers.
Now, even if there are no kids around, I wake up at 7AM at the latest. This should be good for me, I suppose. I get to run out and experience the full day, or something. But I don't feel that way. I feel like a complete asshat for getting up that early. I feel lamer than shit. Which is completely irrational. Then again, most anything I think or do now is beyond explanation. So rest up, kids. Because soon you'll be chewing Ambien like they're fucking Bubbalicious.
Seriously, read the whole thing.
(H/T Cajun Boy in the City)
Posted by litbrit at 12:08 PM | Permalink | Comments (9)
"Lipstick Vogue" - Elvis Costello
A young, lean, and mean Elvis Costello, with the Attractions, ripping through Lipstick Vogue circa 1977/78, live and in the rain.
Sometimes I think that love is just a tumor, you've got to cut it out.
Sorry for the lack of posts -- America's pension system is in full melt down mode and I have been lending my feeble efforts to trying to put a bunch of union plans on solid footing -- maybe we should just tack on the word "bank" at the end of their names and ask Timmy for a check.
Posted by Sir Charles at 11:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Wasn't just a few years ago that Republicans were blaming the CIA for giving Bush "faulty intelligence" about Iraq? Weren't Republicans pushing, for a little while at least, the idea that our involvement in Iraq was all the CIA's fault?
How interesting to see such a change of heart. Just a few years ago, the CIA was the cause of all our problems, but now, they've "kept us safe."
The Republicans in Congress are really abhorrent people.
Posted by Stephen Suh at 10:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (6)
Recent Comments